, while also making it difficult to get the ransom-collectors ' identities , thanks to the level of anonymity it offers . WannaCryAttack.Ransom, the biggest ransomware event of the year , for example , hitAttack.Ransomhundreds of thousands of PCs around the globe , encrypting files and demanding a paymentAttack.Ransomof $ 300 in bitcoin for the safe return of what was stored on the machine . In this instance , the ransomware code itself was poorly written and the vast majority of victims were able to restore their systems without giving into the demandsAttack.Ransomof the cyber-attackers . However , by the time those behind WannaCryAttack.Ransomhad withdrawn funds from the associated Bitcoin wallets -- a full three months after the attack -- it meant the 338 paymentsAttack.Ransomvictims had made were worth around $ 140,000 , which was an increase in value of just under $ 50,000 compared to when the majority of payments were madeAttack.Ransom. If those behind WannaCryAttack.Ransomhave held onto their illicit investment , they could now be sitting on over $ 1m of bitcoin . But the sudden spike in bitcoin could actually be problematic for some cybercriminals . Before the surge in value , 1 or 0.5 bitcoin was a common ransom demandAttack.Ransom, with the idea that if the fee was low enough -- back then the ransom value worked out at a few hundred dollars -- this would encourage the victim to pay upAttack.Ransom. Even as the value of bitcoin steadily rose during the summer , some attackers were still using the standard amounts of cryptocurrency as their ransom demandAttack.Ransom. For example , Magniber ransomware demanded a paymentAttack.Ransomof 0.2 bitcoin ( $ 1,138 in mid-October ) , rising to 0.4 bitcoin ( $ 2,275 in mid-October ) if the payment wasn't receivedAttack.Ransomwithin five days . Two months later , 0.2 bitcoin is currently worth $ 3,312 while 0.4 bitcoin is up to $ 6,625 . Many forms of ransomware already ask for the paymentAttack.Ransomof a specified amount of dollars to be made in bitcoin . While it pins hopes on victims being able to buy a specific amount of bitcoin and successfully transfer the payment -- which some criminal gangs get around by manning help desks providing advice on buying cryptocurrency -- it 's more likely to result in the victim paying upAttack.Ransom, especially if the figure is just a few hundred dollars . `` I imagine the volatility of bitcoin pricing has been an unexpected problem for cybercriminals . The average ransom demandAttack.Ransomhas remained somewhere between $ 300 to $ 1000 , and normally the ransom note will specify a USD amount , '' Andy Norton , director of threat intelligence at Lastline , told ZDNet . It is n't just ransomware distributors who might be faced with the problem of valuing items in pure bitcoin : a Dark Web vendor -- whether they are selling malware , weapons , drugs , or any other illegal item -- might find that setting their price in pure bitcoin will quickly result in them pricing themselves out of the market . With bitcoin prices continuing to rise , sophisticated cybercriminal operators can likely react to it , altering prices on a day-to-day basis to ensure that they 're able to sustain their business . Criminals are trying out alternative pricing models for ransomware already . Some criminals already operate around the idea that they chargeAttack.Ransomvictims just enough so that they do n't see the ransomAttack.Ransomas too much to payAttack.Ransom-- and that often depends on the country the victims are in . The Fatboy ransomware payment scheme chargesAttack.Ransomvictims in poorer countries less than those in richer ones . Meanwhile , those behind Scarab ransomware have started askingAttack.Ransomvictims to suggest a payment amountAttack.Ransomfor receiving the encryption key for their files .
LabCorp experienced a breach this past weekend , which it nows says was a ransomware attackAttack.Ransom. The intrusion has also prompted concerns that patient data may have also been stolenAttack.Databreach. One of the biggest clinical lab testing companies in the world , LabCorp , was hitAttack.Ransomwith a `` new variant of ransomware '' over the weekend . `` LabCorp promptly took certain systems offline as a part of its comprehensive response to contain and remove the ransomware from its system , '' the company told PCMag in an email . `` We are working to restore additional systems and functions over the next several days . '' LabCorp declined to say what variant of ransomware was used . But according to The Wall Street Journal , the company was hitAttack.Ransomwith a strain known as SamSam . In March , the same strain attackedAttack.Ransomthe city of Atlanta 's IT network . Like other ransomware variants , SamSam will effectively lock down a computer , encrypting all the files inside , and then demandAttack.Ransomthe victim pay upAttack.Ransomto free the system . In the Atlanta attackAttack.Ransom, the anonymous hackers demandedAttack.Ransom$ 51,000 , which the city government reportedly refused to payAttack.Ransom. How much the hackers are demandingAttack.Ransomfrom LabCorp is n't clear ; the company declined to answer further questions about the attackAttack.Ransomor if it will pay the ransomAttack.Ransom. The lab testing provider first reported the breach on Monday , initially describing it as `` suspicious activity '' on the company 's IT systems that relate to healthcare diagnostics . This prompted fears that patient data may have been stolenAttack.Databreach. The North Carolina-based company processes more than 2.5 million lab tests per week and has over 1,900 patient centers across the US . `` LabCorp also has connections to most of the hospitals and other clinics in the United States , '' Pravin Kothari , CEO of cybersecurity firm CipherCloud , said in an email . `` All of this presents , at some point , perhaps an increased risk of cyber attacks propagating and moving through this expanded ecosystem . '' On Thursday , LabCorp issued a new statement and said the attackAttack.Ransomwas a ransomware strain . At this point , the company has found `` no evidence of theftAttack.Databreachor misuse of data , '' but it 's continuing to investigate . `` As part of our in-depth and ongoing investigation into this incident , LabCorp has engaged outside security experts and is working with authorities , including law enforcement , '' the company added .
The group of hackers that leakedAttack.Databreachthe upcoming fifth season of “ Orange Is the New Black ” this weekend may have also secured accessAttack.Databreachto some three dozen other shows and movies . TheDarkOverlord , as the group calls itself , provided cybersecurity blog DataBreaches.net with a long list of movies and TV shows it claimed to have stolenAttack.Databreachfrom Larson Studios , a Hollywood-based audio post-production company . In addition to “ Orange Is the New Black , ” it also lists a number of high-profile shows from the big broadcast networks , including ABC ’ s “ The Catch , ” NBC ’ s “ Celebrity Apprentice , ” CBS ’ “ NCIS Los Angeles , ” and Fox ’ s “ New Girl. ” Other shows included are IFC ’ s “ Portlandia , ” FX ’ s “ It ’ s Always Sunny in Philadelphia , ” “ Breakthrough ” from NatGeo , E ! ’ s “ The Arrangement , ” “ Bunk ’ d ” from the Disney Channel , and Netflix ’ s “ Bill Nye Saves the World. ” The list also makes mention of a few movies , including the Netflix original “ Win It All , ” the Lifetime TV movie “ A Midsummers Nightmare , ” and a YouTube Red Liza Koshy special . It ’ s worth noting that this list is by no means confirmed . ABC , NBC , Fox , FX , IFC , and NatGeo all declined to comment when contacted by Variety . CBS and E ! did not respond . Netflix acknowledged the breach in a statement earlier this weekend , saying : “ We are aware of the situation . A production vendor used by several major TV studios had its security compromised and the appropriate law enforcement authorities are involved. ” The company hasn ’ t commented on details of the leak . TheDarkOverlord suggested on Twitter earlier this weekend that it might be trying to extortAttack.RansomFox , IFC , Nat Geo , and ABC next , but it is unknown whether they may be in the process of trying to extortAttack.Ransomother studios and networks . The hackers had previously unsuccessfully tried to solicit extortion moneyAttack.Ransomfrom Larson Studios as well as Netflix to not release “ Orange Is the New Black , ” and may have used the release of the entire season this weekend as a way to pressure others to pay upAttack.Ransom.
Disney boss Bob Iger has said the mass media giant is being targeted by hackers who are trying to extort moneyAttack.Ransomfrom the firm by threatening to release a film they claim to have stolenAttack.Databreach. The CEO of the entertainment behemoth told ABC employees of the stand-off at a town hall meeting in New York , multiple sources told The Hollywood Reporter . The hackers are said to have demandedAttack.Ransoma substantial paymentAttack.Ransomin Bitcoin , and threatened to release five minutes of the unnamed film and then subsequent 20-minute chunks if their demandsAttack.Ransomaren ’ t met . There are rumors circulating that the film in question could be upcoming blockbuster Pirates of the Caribbean : Dead Men Tell No Tales , although the hackers are running out of time if so as it ’ s due to open next Friday . The news calls to mind a similar incident last month when a hacker uploaded the upcoming series of Netflix prison drama Orange is the New Black to The Pirate Bay after the streaming giant refused to pay upAttack.Ransom. In that instance , Netflix claimed that “ a production vendor used by several major TV studios had its security compromised ” , highlighting the need for organizations in the entertainment sector to revisit their cyber-defenses and those of their partners . Mark James , security specialist at Eset , argued that anything of high value will be a target for thieves , be it digital or physical . “ Disney has refused to pay the ransomAttack.Ransomand rightly so . If you ’ re going to download the film from an unofficial or dodgy source anyway then a month before or a month after is not going to make much of a difference , ” he added . `` The film industry has been plagued with piracy issues as early as the 1960s and this is n't going to change anytime soon . Paying the ransomAttack.Ransomor indeed any ransomAttack.Ransomis generally frowned upon for many reasons . Funding other criminal activity , rewarding the bad guys or funding future attacks are all good reasons to not pay as the chances are it ’ s going to get released anyway . ”